Les deux fournisseurs ont décidé de renforcer leur collaboration dans la zone EMEA en lançant un programme partenaires destiné à certains des revendeurs (...)... lire la suite
Les deux fournisseurs ont decide de renforcer leur collaboration dans la zone EMEA en lancant un programme partenaires destine a certains des revendeurs (...)
Sam4U (a prononcer Sam For You) : tel est le nom du nouveau programme partenaires que lancera officiellement Samsung au mois d'avril prochain. Un programme (...)
Le Plessis-Robinson, 26 mars 2008 - Sereneo, editeur des solutions Evoleon pour la gestion de l'expression des besoins utilisateurs dans les projets informatiques, presente son programme partenaire « Centres de competences Evoleon ». Dans le cadre d'un partenariat oriente services, les revendeurs et integrateurs labellises apportent une assistance de proximite pour le deploiement, le parametrage et l'utilisation d'Evoleon EB.
Trois mois apres l'arrivee d'un directeur channel, Bruno Abelin, . Ce programme, nomme ARK (Adaptability Resources (...)
Dans certains pays (Etats-Unis, Canada, Australie, Irlande et Japon), Youtube propose un programme partenaires pour remunerer les auteurs des videos en partageant les revenus publicitaires generes par celles-ci. Ce programme est desormais accessible aux francais...
Le titre de «partenaire» est deja disponible depuis plusieurs mois aux Etats-Unis, au Canada, en Grande-Bretagne ou au Japon. Il faut remplir quelques conditions. Tout d'abord, il est necessaire de s'inscrire au programme. Les videos se doivent d'etre des creations originales qui peuvent etre diffusees en ligne. L'utilisateur doit detenir les droits d'auteur et de diffusion. Le contenu doit etre de qualite et mis a jour regulierement. L'equipe du site visionnera chaque video.
atraveo presente la nouvelle version de son programme partenaire pour le marche de locations de vacances, avec de nombreuses fonctions nouvelles. La plus inte...
After years of public disagreement over ensuring interoperability between their respective software, Microsoft and Samba have come to terms. And not surprisingly, each vendor is offering quite a different spin on the licensing agreement they unveiled on December 20. It took an intermediary, the Protocol Freedom Information Foundation (PFIF) — a non-profit organization created by the Software Freedom Law Center — to hand off the Microsoft protocol documentation that Samba said it needed to make its Unix/Linux file/print sharing products work properly with Windows. According to a press release issued December 20, Samba is paying Microsoft a one-time sum of 10,000 Euros, after which the PFIF will make available to the Samba Team, under non-disclosure, “the documentation needed for implementation of all of the workgroup server protocols covered by the European Union decision.” (The EU decision to which this refers is the Microsoft’s loss of its appeal to overturn the European Commission’s 2004 antitrust decision against the company.) Not surprisingly, Samba and Microsoft had quite different spins on today’s news. Samba and the PFIF characterized the agreement as a victory for free software projects. They also reminded observers that Microsoft was required by the European Commission to provide this protocol information as part of the terms of the EU antitrust case. Samba also emphasized that the agreement with Microsoft does not mean Samba is acknowledging that it was or is in violation of any Microsoft patents. “We will be able to use the information obtained to continue to develop Samba and create more Free Software. We are hoping to get back to the productive relationship we had with Microsoft during the early 1990’s when we shared information about these protocols. The agreement also clarifies the exact patent numbers concerned so there is no possibility of misunderstandings around this issue.” Microsoft, meanwhile, portrayed the protocol agreement with Samba in a more congenial way. In a post to the Microsoft Port 25 blog, entitled “If you’re surprised, you’re not paying attention,” Microsoft Director of Platform and Technology Strategy Sam Ramji, emphasized recent cooperation between Samba and Microsoft. Ramji noted that Microsoft recently donated Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) Premium subscriptions to the core Samba team; built a test bed with them; started sharing testing tools; and worked to preserve the Unix Extensions in CIFS to ensure continued compatibility with Microsoft’s software. “The terms were good, but the Samba team wanted Microsoft to make some changes to fully conform with the existing practices of the Samba developer community .... Attorneys and technologists (always an odd combination) on both sides worked hard to refine the language and do so in a clear and cooperative way. ... However you spin the deal, Microsoft is now doing what the European Commision stipulated three years ago: Sharing protocol information in a way that does not discriminate against the open-source/free-software community.
Now that Microsoft has passed the Acid2 Browser test, is Opera Software satisfied? If dropping its antitrust complaint filed last week with the European Commission is the measure, the answer is no. I asked Opera whether Microsoft’s announcement on December 19 that an internal Internet Explorer 8 build has passed the Acid2 test meant a change in its complaint. Opera asked the European courts to require Microsoft to change its practice of bundling IE with Windows, as well as to compel Microsoft to make IE comply with accepted Web standards. “We congratulate Microsoft on the screenshots showing IE8 passing the ACID2 test. We appreciate the effort of Microsoft’s developers in this achievement. Microsoft, for its part, is saying that its decision to go public this week with plans to make IE 8 Acid2-compliant had nothing to do with the timing of Opera’s filing. (I don’t buy that for a second, but that’s what IE Development chief Dean Hachamovitch told me.) “To help Microsoft and other browser makers support standards correctly, the Acid2 test was developed and published by the Web Standards Group. When published, it exposed bugs in all browsers. The programmers of Safari, Firefox and Opera got to work quickly and the latest versions of these browsers now pass the difficult test. Microsoft took a very different attitude and has not, seemingly, made any efforts to pass the test. This tells me we must do more than just ask them nicely.”